Stalking Charges Attorney in Minneapolis
Protecting Your Rights Against Stalking and Harassment Charges in Minneapolis
Stalking and harassment charges in Minnesota carry serious penalties, and the specific charge you face depends on the alleged conduct and how the prosecution applies the statute. At Brockton D. Hunter P.A., we defend individuals in Minneapolis against both gross misdemeanor harassment and felony stalking allegations, from cases involving a single incident to those built around a claimed pattern of contact over time.
If you are facing stalking or harassment charges, timely legal counsel is essential. Call (612) 979-1112 or schedule a confidential consultation with Brockton D. Hunter P.A.'s Minneapolis defense attorneys today.
What Minnesota Law Says About Stalking & Harassment
Minnesota’s stalking and harassment statute, Minn. Stat. § 609.749, distinguishes between gross misdemeanor harassment and several felony-level provisions, including aggravated violations, repeat-offense enhancements, and felony stalking based on a pattern of conduct. Which provision applies to your case shapes how a defense is built.
Gross Misdemeanor Harassment
Under subdivision 2, harassment is a gross misdemeanor when a person commits a listed act with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate, and the act places the victim in reasonable fear of substantial bodily harm, causes fear for family or household members, or causes substantial emotional distress. Listed acts include following or monitoring another person in person or through any technological means, returning to another’s property without a right to be there, repeated calls or text messages, and nonconsensual use of another’s personal information to solicit a sexual act from a third party, among others.
Current law requires proof that the person acted with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate the victim but does not require separate proof that the person specifically intended to cause the victim’s fear or emotional distress. The prosecution must show that the act placed the victim in reasonable fear or caused, or could reasonably be expected to cause, substantial emotional distress.
Felony Stalking
Under subdivision 5, felony stalking requires proof of two or more qualifying predicate acts within a five-year period. A predicate act is a violation of one of a specific list of other statutes, including terroristic threats, domestic assault, violations of harassment restraining orders or domestic abuse no-contact orders, certain trespass offenses, and criminal sexual conduct. The state must prove each alleged predicate act independently, and that structure is central to how these cases are defended.
Penalties Under Minn. Stat. § 609.749
The consequences of a conviction extend well beyond the sentence itself.
Sentence Ranges by Offense Level
Gross misdemeanor harassment carries up to 364 days in jail, a fine of up to $3,000, or both.
Felony stalking under subdivision 5 carries up to 10 years in prison, a fine of up to $20,000, or both.
Aggravated violations under subdivision 3 become felonies punishable by up to five years and a $10,000 fine when the offense is motivated by the victim’s actual or perceived race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, national origin, or disability; involves false impersonation or a dangerous weapon; targets a judicial officer, prosecutor, defense attorney, or juror; or is committed against a victim under 18 by someone more than 36 months older. If the offense against a minor also involves sexual or aggressive intent, the penalty rises to up to 10 years and a $20,000 fine.
Prior domestic violence convictions also affect sentencing. A second or subsequent violation within 10 years of a qualified domestic violence-related conviction is a felony carrying up to five years for one prior conviction, or up to 10 years for two or more, with corresponding fines up to $10,000 or $20,000.
Collateral Consequences
Beyond incarceration and fines, a felony conviction under this statute requires the court to order an independent mental health assessment. If that assessment identifies a treatment need, the sentence includes a treatment requirement. Conviction also triggers firearm consequences: a mandatory multi-year possession prohibition, required transfer of any firearms to a licensed dealer, law enforcement agency, or qualifying third party, and summary forfeiture of any firearm used during the offense.
Call Brockton D. Hunter P.A. at (612) 979-1112 to schedule your consultation today, or get in touch with us online using our easy-to-use online contact form.
OUR VICTORIES
Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their case might be.
-
Reduced STATE OF MINNESOTA v. N.J.: Client Charged With Gross Misdemeanor Third Degree Dui Pleads to Reduced Charge of Misdeameanor Four
N. J. Was charged with Third Degree DUI in Hennepin County after a blood test showed his blood alcohol content was .25, more than 3x the legal limit.
-
Not Guilty STATE v. M.O.: Trial Results in Not Guilty Verdict on Most Serious Domestic Assault Charges
M.O. was accused of assaulting his wife in their St. Paul home. A military veteran and former Federal Agent, M.O. had extensive training in calming dangerous situations and disarming suspects.
-
Reduced STATE v. T.C.: Client Convicted of 1st Degree Assault Avoids Additional 74 Months in Prison
T.C. was arrested in Rochester, Minnesota in Olmsted County and charged with First Degree Assault. T.C.
-
Dropped STATE v. D.B.: Brock Hunter Gets Dwi Charges Dropped and License Revocation Rescinded
Brock’s client was suspected of driving under the influence of Vicodin. She was charged with DWI and her license was revoked under the Minnesota Implied Consent law.
-
Dropped STATE V. T.M.: Self-Defense Argument Results in Hung Jury and All Charges Dismissed
Brock and Ryan’s client was charged with second degree assault with a deadly weapon after an altercation.
-
Reduced State v. NS: Hennepin County 4th Degree Dwi Case
Our client, NS, was rear ended while driving home. His blood alcohol content was measured at .12.